FROM PHOENIX, ARIZONAGLOBAL AFFAIRS
Phoenix 1. Fox to Guard Chicken Coop
Washington 2. Epilogue: Kissinger Quits!12/13/2002
Fox to Guard Chicken Coop
The Kissinger Appointment to Head Bush's 9/11 Whitewash Commission: Like Putting Criminals in Charge of Prisons
PHOENIX, Dec 5 - “Whenever
you want to bury a story, you try to get it out on or around major
holidays,” opined recently a former corporate PR news-spinner, now a
reporter with a major U.S. newspaper.
what President George W. Bush tried to do when he appointed Henry
Kissinger to head up the 9/11 investigation.
He chose to do announce it on Wednesday Nov. 27, as most Americans
were more focused on their Thanksgiving turkeys rather than on political
Well, the ploy didn’t work. Not his time. Not “Regarding Henry.” The Kissinger announcement was equivalent of appointing a fox to guard a chicken coop. Or of putting criminals in charge of prisons. Or like having Mike Tyson champion women’s rights.
It was just too
controversial and too arrogant a a move to be overlooked even on the eve
of a major U.S. holiday. An
avalanche of pro and con calls, letters and comments that have appeared in
the American media since that time attest to it.
“It is tempting
to wonder if the choice of Mr. Kissinger is not a clever maneuver by the
White House to contain an investigation it long opposed,” the New York
Times asked in a Nov.
But the Washington establishment scribes, such as William Safire, a New York Times columnist who had been critical of Kissinger in the past, quickly fell into line [Safire disliked Kissinger for personal reasons - “he caused the tapping of my (Safire’s) home phone when we both worked at the (Nixon) White House”].
“Kissinger has become a foreign-policy resource, capable of reassessing his earlier disdain for Wilsonian idealism,” Safire wrote in his Dec 2 column. “Does that qualify him for chief 9/11 inquisitor? If the main object is to find the sinners of commission, no; if to discover the sins of omission, probably; if to recommend strategic changes in our approach to the war on terror, certainly.”
“On top of that, he's equipped to fit the facts into a "conceptual framework" — his beloved cliché — to provide desperately needed guidance to the Homeland Security bureaucracy,” Safire said.
So “welcome back, Henry,” Safire cheerfully greeted his old foe’s appointment in conclusion of his column.
And what do we think of it? We think it is a travesty. The Kissinger appointment shows how brazenly arrogant and disrespectful our plutocratic President is of the American people’s quest for fair play and justice. By naming the penultimate elitist and New World Order insider to head up the 9/11 investigation, the only thing the President will have ensured is more scorn and disdain from the American people.
For, not only has “Henry the Terrible” openly peddled his Washington influence for cash treasure even to some of the world’s most unsavory characters; he is wanted for murder and other crimes in a number of countries around the world (see some examples below).
And that’s the most upstanding citizen the President could find whom Americans are supposed to trust to tell us the truth about who knew what and when in our government about the 9/11 attacks?
Oh, please… Mr. Pretzel Prez, our beloved Potus Potatus Primus (our Couch Potato-in-Chief). Must you add insult to injury? (insult - to our intelligence; injury - to our sense of justice). Don’t you think we already know most of the nauseating details “Regarding Henry?”
By way of a reminder, here are just some of the highlights from Kissinger’s unofficial, and often hidden, biography. They alone should have disqualified him from serving in any official capacity, except perhaps for serving time - perhaps in some rat-infested South American or Asian prison…
“Regarding Henry” - Some Highlights
Soviet or Double Agent?
This near-octogenarian (born in Germany in 1923, emigrated
to the U.S. in 1938), who later became renown for his anti-communism,
served Soviet Union as a secret agent in his youth,” alleged Frank
Capel in his book, “Henry Kissinger, Soviet Agent.”
anti-Communist who infiltrated Polish Communist Intelligence and rose to
the equivalent rank of general, has now named Henry Kissinger as a Soviet
agent, recruited into a special group known as ODRA while he was a
sergeant in the U.S. Armed Forces in Germany during World War II,” Capel
wrote (see Joel
Skousen’s World Affairs Brief, Nov 29, 2002).
recent revelations indicate that Kissinger was actually assigned by the
OSS to infiltrate Communist ranks and serve the US as a double agent. He performed this role during the FDR administration under
the auspices of double agents such as Alger Hiss, Mr. Sousen notes.
Advocate of “Limited” Nuclear War
was a Soviet or a double agent in WW II, he emerged as an ardent
anti-Communist following his BA, MA and PhD degrees at Harvard (in 1950,
1952 and 1954 respectively). Thereafter
he served as Study Director, Nuclear Weapons and Foreign Policy, for the
Council of Foreign Relations from 1955 to 1956; Director of the Special
Studies Project for the Rockefeller Brothers Fund from 1956 to 1958; and
Director of the Harvard Defense Studies Program from 1958 to 1971.
It was during this
period that Kissinger made a name for himself as an advocate of a
“limited” nuclear war. Here’s
an excerpt about it from a TiM
Bulletin Apr. 2, 1999, published at the height of NATO’s war on
reader, commenting about the above Kissinger interview, said that in 1958,
Kissinger authored a book on nuclear policy, in which there is a chapter
devoted to "limited nuclear war." Kissinger lauded the
efficiency and ethics of such a war without total destruction, or
"all out exchanges."
"masterpiece" shot Kissinger into the high esteem of CFR/TLC
(and Bilderbergers), our correspondent says, and included everything
wonderful about nuclear war, stopping short of recommending the doomsday
"Did Stanley Kubrick used Dr. Kissinger's book for the Dr. Strangelove story?" this TiM reader wondered. "We'll never know; Kubrick died a few weeks ago. After all, politics, war, death, reengineering of nations and economics go hand in hand like koi fish in the zen pond."
As is the case
with many New World Order globalists, Kissinger seems also afflicted with
Russophobia. Not in public,
of course. But a TiM reader
from Brussels with good European Union connections had this to say about
some of his private remarks made in Brussels on the eve of NATO’s war on
of my acquaintance was sitting next to Henry Kissinger at a meeting of
"big finance" heads. Kissinger,
thinking that he was only surrounded by his peers, told that "it is
in the interest of all to keep a couple of wars going on in Russia".
To which we
So much for the "Partnership for Peace" farce! Of course, I've been saying for years that that's a euphemism for a new "Drang Nach Osten." But it's good to have Ol' Henry confirm it.
Courting Red China
Yet despite his
professed anti-communism, Kissinger had no problems courting Red China
even during the murderous Mao regime.
In fact, he is credited for having laid the ground for Richard
Nixon’s first visit to China in 1972.
And even since leaving his government posts, Kissinger has been
acting as a lobbyist for Red China.
What about the
Tiananmen Square massacre? Just
as the then sitting President, George Bush (Sr), Kissinger looked the
other way after the Chinese government mowed down thousands of
pro-democracy demonstrators at Beijing’s main square.
In fact, since the June 4, 1989 massacre, western multinationals have rewarded the Chinese communists with nearly half a trillion dollars in direct foreign investments - the biggest capital inflow of any country in the world except for the U.S. (see “China: The Real Cold War Winner”, Feb. 2002). The U.S. trade deficit with China also surged from $6 billion in 1989, to nearly $84 billion in 2000. The U.S.-China trade rose from $17.8 billion in 1989, to $116.4 billion in 2000 (see China-U.S. Trade Issues, a Congressional Research Service report).
So much for championing the western democratic ideals.
Furthermore, this alleged anti-communist was also willing to trade Taiwanese independence and American jobs for cheap
Red China labor. He his
bosses allowed the Beijing communists to replace Taiwan in the U.N. He remained silent about the U.S. prisoners of war not being
released by Vietnam after the official end of hostilities.
And Kissinger lobbied for China’s admission to the World Trade
In short, serving
globalists’ interests and accumulating personal wealth mattered more to
him than ideology and patriotism.
Do the names such as Bush, Rockefeller and Clinton conjure up
You can also add
to the list Lou Gerstner (former IBM CEO) and Katherine Graham (the
Washington Post publisher) - the only other guests at the gala Clinton
White House dinner given for the Chinese President in October 1997 who are
members of all three major globalist organizations (CFR, Trilateral
Commission and Bilderbergers Group).
In fact, Mrs. Graham was David Rockefeller’s dinner date (see the
Wing of the New World Order”, Jan. 1998).
And IBM’s Lou Gerstner has just been named chairman of Carlyle
Group, a private defense contractor that has been closely linked both to
Bush family and bin Laden families (see Item
4 - “Bushwhacked…” - Oct 3, 2001).
Nor was China the only communist country that Kissinger and his associates lavished with their attention and favors. Even the erstwhile Serbian dictator, Slobodan Milosevic, was once their valued client. Here’s an excerpt from “Milosevic: From Communist Apparatchik to NWO Bogeyman to Nationalist Martyr,” Feb. 2002).
November 1993 article titled "Plutocracy Is Alive and Well in
America," I quoted something Milosevic said to me during our first
meeting at his office in Belgrade in January 1990. Here's an excerpt (see “Stitching
Together the New World Order Flag,” November 1999):
remember meeting (David) Rockefeller as well as (Larry) Eagleburger (the
former U.S. Secretary of State) at a gala party to mark the opening of our
New York branch," this former Belgrade banker told me nearly four
years ago (i.e., in Jan/90). "And
even though Eagleburger was an important government official, while
Rockefeller was 'only' a businessman, I noticed that Eagleburger called
Rockefeller 'Sir,' while Rockefeller called Eagleburger 'Larry.'"
takes one to know one," goes the old saw. Maybe the power-thirsty
Communist banker, who bullied his way into Serbian presidency, figured out
who really runs the American plutocracy masquerading as democracy - the
men and women from the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the Trilateral
Commission (TLC)." […]
Milosevic had figured all this out (in the 1980s), it could help explain
why he treated the U.S. government representatives, like Warren
Zimmermann, the former U.S. ambassador to Yugoslavia, for example, or
Lawrence Eagleburger, the former Secretary of State, with such disdain.
Unlike most Americans, Milosevic may have realized that he was dealing
with mere minions, not with men of power,"
I said in that November 1993 article.
Milosevic (TiM Ed.: like Saddam) committed
the worst sin for a would-be poster boy.
He bit the hand that fed him.
This communist apparatchik demonstrated the strategic vision of an
ant when he gambled on the backing of the Soviet Union against the
U.S.-led NWO. As the USSR bit the dust in 1991, the former poster boy’s
posterior was left bare for punishment.
Which came in the form of U.N. sanctions, the Bosnian and Kosovo
wars, and finally, the imprisonment and trial for genocide at the U.N.
Tribunal at the Hague.
So what does that
have to do with Kissinger? Well,
at the time they were opening the doors within the U.S. establishment
circles for Milosevic, both Eagleburger (former Bush Sr.’s Secretary of
State) and Brent Scowcroft (former Bush Sr.’s National Security Adviser)
were working for Kissinger Associates, as you can see from the “Courting
Saddam” segment (next).
It is widely known
that Saddam Hussein was regarded as an important American asset in the
1980s. That’s when his war
against Iran, then the chief U.S. adversary in Central Asia, made him a
strategic ally. What is less
well known is the role Kissinger Associates played in supporting Saddam. Our government looked the other way even when he used the
internationally banned mustard gas against the Kurds and the Iranians.
But there is more…
excerpt from a May 1991 letter, for example, written to President Bush
(Sr.) by Henry Gonzalez, in which the then Banking Committee chairman
expresses his concerns about the role Henry Kissinger and Kissinger
Associates had in facilitating over $4 billion in unreported loans to the
government of Iraq between 1985 and 1990:
COMMITTEE ON BANKING,
FINANCE AND URBAN AFFAIRS,
Washington, DC, May 2,1991.
GEORGE BUSH, President of the United States, Washington, DC
PRESIDENT: The House Banking Committee is conducting an investigation into
over $4 billion in unreported loans the former employees of the Atlanta
branch of Banca Nazionale del Lavoro (BNL) provided to the government of
Iraq between 1985 and 1990. The Committee's investigation has uncovered
the fact that Henry Kissinger was on the International Advisory Board of
BNL during that same time period and that BNL was a client of Kissinger
Scowcroft's and Mr. Eagleburger's actions seem out of step at a time when
the U.S. should be leading a worldwide effort to limit arms proliferation.
The positions held by these men are of the utmost importance to the
national security of the United States. Persons filling such important
positions must be independent from past associations which could cloud
you will consider the issues I have raised in this letter and, if
necessary, take appropriate action to ensure that potential conflicts are
you for your time and consideration.
Furthermore, in his subsequent speech before Congress (see H2694, Apr. 28, 1992), Rep. Gonzalez alleged that Kissinger had “deliberately misled the public.” In other words, that the former Secretary of State lied. Here’s an excerpt from the House transcript:
DELIBERATELY MISLEADS PUBLIC
recently, Mr. Kissinger was a member of the BNL's international advisory
board and during the height of the BNL-Atlanta scandal BNL was a paying
client of Kissinger Associates.
Henry Kissinger was a paid member of the BNL's advisory board for
international policy between 1985 and June 1991, he received at least
$10,000 for attending each meeting of the BNL advisory board. Mr.
Kissinger met each year with the president of BNL when the latter visited
the United States to attend the annual IMF conference in Washington, DC.
BNL advisory board members included David Rockefeller, the chairman of the
Rockefeller Group and a director of Chase Manhattan Bank, Pierre Trudeau,
the former Prime Minister of Canada, Lord Thornycroft, the former British
Minister of Defense, and other politically well-connected international
April 25, 1991, floor statement on Mr. Kissinger, he told the Financial
Times newspaper that he had resigned from the BNL advisory board a week
before the BNL indictment in February 1991 because `he did not want to
answer questions about such incidents.'
weeks ago, the prominent TV show, `60 Minutes,' revealed that Kissinger
had not resigned from the BNL advisory board in February 1991, as he had
told the Financial Times. In fact, `60 Minutes' reported that Mr.
Kissinger served on BNL's advisory board until his contract expired in the
summer of 1991, more than 4 months after the date he had previously
Kissinger was not the only Kissinger Associates employee that dealt with
BNL. Mr. Brent Scowcroft, the vice chairman and Mr. Lawrence Eagleburger,
the president of Kissinger Associates also had relationships with BNL.
And what was the strategic significance of illicit BNL loans? Here’s what Rep. Gonzalez said:
billion plus in BNL loans to Iraq between 1985 and 1990 were crucial
to Iraqi efforts to feed its people and to build weapons of mass
destruction. In addition, the BNL loans were crucial to Reagan and
Bush administration efforts to assist Saddam Hussein.
In other words, the Bush the Son now wants to wage war against Saddam over the very weapons of mass destruction that Bush the Father and Kissinger et. al. gave Saddam. Illicitly!
That’s the Bush’s New World Order’s essence. “First you build them up, then you knock them down,” as we’ve pointed out many times before. “Perpetual commerce through perpetual war,” we’ve said should be its motto, not “world peace through world trade,” as the NWO leaders sometimes allege.
And now, Bush the Son wants the American public not only to buy his ludicrous war, but also swallow Kissinger, evidently a proven liar, as the chief custodian of the 9/11 truth? Hm…
Misappropriating Public Records
Christopher Hitchens points out in his Nov. 27 article “9/11
Investigation,” posted at the APFN web site, Kissinger has tried to
hide the truth before by misappropriate and hiding some public records.
Here’s an excerpt:
appropriated the records of his time at the State Department and took them
on a truck to the Rockefeller family estate in New York. He has since been
successfully sued for the return of much of this public property, but
meanwhile he produced, for profit, three volumes of memoirs that purported
to give a full account of his tenure. In several crucial instances, such
as his rendering of U.S. diplomacy with China over Vietnam, with apartheid
South Africa over Angola, and with Indonesia over the invasion of East
Timor (to cite only some of the most conspicuous), declassified documents
have since shown him to be a bald-faced liar.
he deserve a third try at presenting a truthful record after being caught
twice as a fabricator? And on such a grave matter as this?,” Mr.
Ed.: FYI - American Patriot Friends
Network a/k/a American Patriot Fax Network was founded Feb. 21, 1993. It
started with faxing daily reports from the Weaver-Harris trials. “We are
not anti-government, we are anti-corrupt-government,” the APFN site
claims. “Patriot is one who loves God, Family and Country.”]
The bin Laden Family Connection
questions the Kissinger and Bush family ties to the Saudi royal and bin
Laden families, just as we did back in 2001, in the aftermath of the 9/11
events (see Item
4 - “Bushwhacked…” - Oct 3, 2001):
the strong ties between himself (Kissinger), his partners Lawrence
Eagleburger and Brent Scowcroft, and the oil oligarchies of the Gulf, it
must be time for at least a full disclosure of his interests in the
region. This thought does not seem to have occurred to the president or to
the other friends of Prince Bandar and Prince Bandar's wife, who helped in
the evacuation of the Bin Laden family from American soil, without an
interrogation, in the week after Sept. 11.
Also see the Wall
Street Journal, Sep 28, 2001 - "Bin
Laden Family Could Profit From a Jump In Defense Spending Due to Ties to
U.S. Bank" (subscription required).
The Chilean Connections
And then there is
the infamous Chilean connection… and Kissinger’s role in the removal
from power in 1973 of that country’s elected socialist president
Salvador Allende (continuing to quote from Mr. Hitchens article):
Memorial Day 2001, Kissinger was visited by the police in the Ritz Hotel
in Paris and handed a warrant, issued by Judge Roger LeLoire, requesting
his testimony in the matter of disappeared French citizens in Pinochet's
Chile. Kissinger chose to leave town rather than appear at the Palais de
Justice as requested. He has since been summoned as a witness by senior
magistrates in Chile and Argentina who are investigating the international
terrorist network that went under the name "Operation Condor"
and that conducted assassinations, kidnappings, and bombings in several
spectacular such incident occurred in rush-hour traffic in downtown
Washington, D.C., in September 1976, killing a senior Chilean dissident
and his American companion. Until recently, this was the worst incident of
externally sponsored criminal violence conducted on American soil. The
order for the attack was given by Gen. Augusto Pinochet, who has been
vigorously defended from prosecution by Henry Kissinger.
Charged with Murder; Unwelcome in Some Countries
is also charged with murder and unwelcome in some countries around the
world because of his sinister roles in the past (continuing to quote Mr.
on Sept. 10, 2001, a civil suit was filed in a Washington, D.C., federal
court, charging Kissinger with murder. The suit, brought by the survivors
of Gen. Rene Schneider of Chile, asserts that Kissinger gave the order for
the elimination of this constitutional officer of a democratic country
because he refused to endorse plans for a military coup. Every single
document in the prosecution case is a U.S.-government declassified paper.
And the target of this devastating lawsuit is being invited to review the
shortcomings of the "intelligence community"?
2001, the Brazilian government canceled an invitation for Kissinger to
speak in Sao Paulo because it could no longer guarantee his immunity.
Earlier this year, a London court agreed to hear an application for
Kissinger's imprisonment on war crimes charges while he was briefly in the
known that there are many countries to which he cannot travel at all, and
it is also known that he takes legal advice before traveling anywhere.
“Does the Bush administration feel proud of appointing a man who is wanted in so many places, and wanted furthermore for his association with terrorism and crimes against humanity?” Mr. Hitchens asks. “Or does it hope to limit the scope of the inquiry to those areas where Kissinger has clients?”
Kissinger Client List to Be Made Public?
Just who his
clients are is a part of the Henry mystique.
But such a secrecy may be short-lived, now that Henry has reentered
public life. As the New York
Times editors suggested on Nov. 29:
Kissinger must start by severing all ties to Kissinger Associates, the
lucrative consulting business he has built up during the past two decades.
As a consultant, Mr. Kissinger offered not just his own foreign policy
expertise, but his famously easy access to the powerful and well
Moreover, Kissinger will be required to disclose who his clients are, according to a legal opinion just issued by the Congressional Research Service, the research arm of Congress. Here’s an excerpt about it from today’s (Dec 5) Financial Times (of London) news story:
opinion, presented on Wednesday night to the Senate Governmental Affairs
Committee headed by Senator Joseph Lieberman, says that government ethics
rules would require Mr Kissinger to disclose any client who, over the past
two years, had paid him more than $5,000 for consulting work…
White House has said the job as inquiry chairman would be a part-time
post, which would therefore not require Mr Kissinger to disclose publicly
his clients or suspend his consulting work.
But the CRS opinion, which was requested by Democratic staff of the
committee who worked on the legislation establishing the commission,
interprets that exception very narrowly. It says that any commissioner who
works more than 60 days a year on the inquiry would be required to make a
full financial disclosure of all assets, income and liabilities, as well
as listing their clients over the past two years. The disclosures would
then be made public.
addition, the CRS opinion says that the US constitution prohibits any
commissioner from receiving payments from a foreign government, including
state-owned companies, while serving on the commission.
Perhaps more than
anything else we have heard or seen so far about the Kissinger 9/11
commission, the disclosure of his client list may be the first real step
in the truth-seeking direction. But
knowing Henry’s traditional disdain for public disclosure and his
preference for backroom wheeling and dealing, we won’t be holding our
breath for his list to see the light of day any time soon.
Especially with the Bush White House opposing such a revelation.
aren’t we still also waiting to find out more about Dick Cheney’s
meetings with Enron’s and other energy officials, even though these
records have been subpoenaed long ago?
As if our Pretzel
Prez’s picking Kissinger to head up the 9/11 investigation was not bad
enough, the Democrats’ top choice on the commission is also a proven
member of the NWO “globalist elite.”
Even the establishment New York Times agreed with that assessment
in its Nov 29 editorial:
Congressional leaders picked one of their brethren, former Senator George
Mitchell, to serve as vice chairman. Like Mr. Kissinger, Mr. Mitchell has
great experience and an understanding of how the world works -- and is not
known for rocking established institutions.
latest “claim to fame” was his role in Ireland’s Good Friday
“peace process.” Just how
well he did there can best be summarized by the term Prof. J.P. Maher of
Chicago coined to describe it. This
American of Irish descent called it a “piss process” - well before
that became obvious to the public at large (see TiM
Bulletin S99-106, Day 79, June 10, 1999).
In the end,
perhaps the strongest argument we’ve heard in favor of the Kissinger
appointment is that “it takes a thief to catch a thief.”
Perhaps. But what if
the would-be thief-catcher is also bought?
What if his mission is to obfuscate rather than discover the truth?
And what if his “counterpart’s” (Mitchell’s) role is to
whitewash while pretending to oppose?
What we will have
then is a farce, not an investigation.
As we put it in an August
17, 1998 TiM Bulletin:
increasing concentration of power in the hands of an ever smaller number
of New World Order people, one cannot help but recall what Juvenal
(a.d. 60-130) wondered about a similar situation some 21 centuries ago:
"Quis custodiet ipses custodes?" ("Who will guard the
Or as a cynic once
told us, “the only honest politician is the one who stays
bought is a “redeeming” trait that one can indeed associate with the
likes of Kissinger and Mitchell. These
two foxes have stayed loyal to their globalist masters through the years
and decades. Which is why
they’ve been picked to guard the 9/11 chicken coop.
commission will probably be an exercise in whitewashing.
Calling it by any other name will dupe only Evian Americans (read
the word backward). J
As for the truth about who knew what and when… if these two do their job “right,” our grandchildren may still be debating that, just as we are still debating the JFK assassination. That may be the only permanent legacy of the Kissinger-Mitchell Whitewash Commission.
2. Epilogue: Kissinger Quits!12/13/2002
PHOENIX, Dec 13 - Eight days after we published the above editorial, and one day after he assured the 9/11 victims' families he did not have any conflicts of interest, Henry Kissinger abruptly quit the post of the 9/11 investigative commission chairman. Here are two reports about it - from the Washington Post (AP) and the New York Times:
The New York Times - "Kissinger Pulls Out as Chief of Inquiry Into 9/11 Attacks" (Dec. 14)
"Greed Bites Back," "Wall Street Casino Revisited", "Dirty
Tricks with Dirty Bombs", "Repressing
White Americans Through Rampant Immigration",
"Plutocrats of the World
League All-Stars," “Enronizing
Pretzelitis:” New Alzheimer Strain Strikes Potus Potatus Primus
and for others on Global Affairs.
Also, check out... Djurdjevic's CHRONICLES magazine columns: "ON THE BRINK OF MADNESS", "A BEAR IN SHEEP'S CLOTHING", "WALL STREET BOOM, MAIN STREET DOOM", "PERPETUAL WAR FOR PERPETUAL COMMERCE", "WIPING OUT THE MIDDLE CLASS", "WALL STREET'S FINANCIAL TERRORISM"
Or Djurdjevic's WASHINGTON TIMES columns: "Christianity Under Siege," "Silence Over Persecuted Christians", "Chinese Dragon Wagging Macedonian Tail," "An Ugly Double Standard in Kosovo Conflict?", "NATO's Bullyboys", "Kosovo: Why Are We Involved?", and "Ginning Up Another Crisis"
Or Djurdjevic's NEW DAWN (Australia) magazine columns: "Macedonia: Another Farcical American Oil War," "Anti-Christian Crusades," "Blood for Oil, Drugs for Arms", "Washington's Crisis Factory," and "New Iron Curtain Over Europe"